Periodization: An Aside
Now with all that said about periodization, its benefits and its importance, I wanted to touch on this from another angle which represents somewhat of an evolution of my own thinking. Vern Gambetta, considered the founding father of Functional Sports Training, and who prefers to use the term ‘Planned Performance Training’ in place of Periodization has questioned the differing periodization models by saying that the body never responds in a linear fashion, and as such all periodization is basically undulating to some degree. He goes on to say that the distinction in periodized schemes is an exercise in intellectual gymnastics. Well known Canadian trainer, Scott Abel holds a similar philosophy and has said that ‘the application of any program is where the magic lies’. What counts with periodization is the design of the program and the manipulation and variation of the training variables. But, the beauty is in the application of the program and the training experience, not just the program itself. Gambetta goes on to say “variability and contingency must be built into the plan. Plan, execute the plan, evaluate the plan, revise the plan and execute the revised plan.” Remember, there is no such thing as the perfect program. Don’t get locked into the rigidity of what you’re doing. Yes there are principles to adhere to, but the experience of the workout is what you’re training for. Don’t get too trapped in the web of details that can take away from the actual training experience; focus on training intensity. Think of the ICE principle (another Gambetta gem) — Intensity, Concentration, and Effort. As it relates to Undulating Periodization, take note of the main points — focus on more frequent manipulation of the rep schemes you’re using.
← BACK: Periodization: Practical Steps
See the full list of customized fitness and nutrition services for you.